Construction specifications have evolved dramatically over the past decade. What once might have been a straightforward 200-page document has ballooned into comprehensive technical requirements spanning 500+ pages with increasingly granular detail. For general contractors and specialty subcontractors managing commercial projects, this complexity isn’t just an administrative burden – it’s reshaping timelines, budgets, and risk profiles across the industry.
The Drivers Behind Specification Complexity
Stricter Building Codes and Energy Requirements
Building codes have undergone significant expansion to address energy efficiency and climate concerns. The International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) updates every three years, with each iteration introducing more stringent performance requirements. The 2024 IECC achieves 7.8% site energy savings and 6.6% energy cost savings compared to the 2021 edition, according to Department of Energy determinations.
These requirements cascade into specifications that must detail not just what equipment to install, but precise performance metrics, testing protocols, and documentation requirements. A mechanical specification that once listed “provide rooftop unit with economizer” now requires specific SEER ratings, refrigerant types, control sequences, outdoor air damper minimums, and commissioning verification procedures.
For project teams, this means submittal packages have grown exponentially. Each piece of equipment now requires verification of 30 or more technical data points against increasingly detailed specification language. Missing a single requirement – buried in paragraph 3.2.7.C.4 of a 400-page specification – can result in rejection, resubmission, and project delays.
Sustainability and Green Building Standards
The proliferation of green building certifications has added another layer of specification complexity. LEED certifications have grown exponentially, increasing from 5,699 certified projects globally in 2014 to 111,397 projects in 2024 – a nearly twentyfold increase. This growth means more projects include sustainability requirements that must be woven into specifications.
Materials must now be specified with information about embodied carbon, recycled content, regional sourcing, and chemical composition. Specifications routinely require environmental product declarations (EPDs), health product declarations (HPDs), and supply chain transparency documentation. For contractors, this means submittal packages must include not just product data sheets, but extensive environmental and health documentation.
The residential sector alone has seen a 50% rise in LEED certifications over the past five years, with most certified homes located in urban areas. This trend is driving specification requirements even on projects that aren’t pursuing formal certification, as owners and architects incorporate sustainable practices as baseline expectations.
Technology Integration Requirements
Modern buildings are essentially technology platforms, and specifications reflect this reality. Building automation systems, IoT sensors, and data analytics requirements mean specifications must address cybersecurity protocols, data standards, interoperability requirements, and long-term system maintenance.
The global smart building market was valued at $126.35 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 28.5% through 2030. This growth is driven by adoption of IoT, artificial intelligence, and cloud computing technologies – all of which require detailed specification language.
Smart building requirements have introduced specification sections around network architecture, API compatibility, software licensing, and data security that many construction professionals haven’t traditionally dealt with. Mechanical and electrical specifications now include detailed integration requirements for how equipment communicates with building management systems, what protocols must be supported, and how data must be structured and transmitted.
These technical requirements must be precise. Incompatible systems discovered during installation can derail project schedules, require expensive equipment changes, and create long-term operational problems for owners. The burden of verifying this technical compatibility falls on project engineers during submittal review – adding complexity to an already demanding process.
Supply Chain and Manufacturing Documentation
Global supply chain disruptions and increased focus on material traceability have pushed specification writers to require more detailed product documentation. Owners and design teams now regularly specify country of origin requirements, manufacturing certifications, and supply chain verification – particularly for critical equipment and materials.
This trend has intensified following recent supply chain challenges, with specifications now often including detailed sourcing requirements that contractors must verify and document. What was once a simple “provide air handling unit per specifications” requirement might now include mandates for specific manufacturing locations, supplier certifications, lead time documentation, and alternative sourcing plans.
For subcontractors, this means submittal packages must include supply chain documentation, manufacturer certifications, and sometimes detailed explanations of how materials will be sourced and delivered. The administrative burden has grown substantially, with more documentation required for each line item.
What Increased Complexity Means for Your Projects
Extended Submittal Review Cycles
More complex specifications directly translate to more complex submittals – and longer review times. When specifications require 30+ data points verified for each piece of equipment, submittal packages grow from dozens of pages to hundreds. The review burden falls on project engineers and managers who must verify compliance across this expanded scope.
Industry data suggests that inefficient submittal management can lead to project delays of up to 20% and cost overruns exceeding 15%. Each rejected submittal typically adds two to three weeks to the project timeline, and with more complex specifications, the likelihood of missing a requirement increases substantially.
The typical review period for standard submittals is 10-14 business days, but more complex items – like engineered systems with extensive integration requirements – can take significantly longer. When multiple review cycles are required due to non-compliance issues, these delays compound quickly.
Increased Risk of Non-Compliance
Specification complexity creates more opportunities for non-compliance – both intentional and accidental. A mechanical contractor might submit equipment that meets 90% of requirements but misses a specific refrigerant type, control sequence, or accessory requirement buried deep in the specification.
These seemingly minor omissions can result in rejected submittals, project delays, or worse – installed equipment that must be replaced. The downstream costs are significant: additional design team review time, re-coordination with other trades, the administrative burden of resubmitting documentation, and potential schedule impacts to other work sequences.
In worst-case scenarios, equipment gets installed that doesn’t meet specifications, only to be discovered during commissioning or final inspection. The cost of replacement at that stage – including removal, reinstallation, testing, and schedule delays – can be catastrophic to project budgets.
Resource Strain on Project Teams
The expanded scope of submittal review requirements has placed enormous strain on project engineering and management teams. What might have taken a few hours to review a decade ago can now consume days of detailed verification work.
For general contractors, this often means project engineers spend disproportionate amounts of time on submittal reviews rather than coordination, problem-solving, and other high-value activities. The technical expertise required has also increased – reviewing smart building integration requirements or complex sustainability documentation requires knowledge that many early-career project engineers are still developing.
Specialty contractors face similar challenges. Smaller mechanical, electrical, and plumbing firms may not have dedicated personnel for submittal preparation, meaning project managers and foremen are pulled away from field operations to compile documentation packages. The administrative burden has grown to the point where it’s becoming a competitive disadvantage for smaller firms.
Quality Control Challenges
With the volume and complexity of submittal requirements expanding, maintaining consistent quality control becomes increasingly difficult. Human error becomes more likely when verifying hundreds of data points across dozens of submittals. A single oversight – missing that the specified valve actuator requires a specific communication protocol – can cascade into larger problems.
The challenge is particularly acute on projects with tight schedules. When project teams are under pressure to process submittals quickly to maintain the schedule, the thoroughness of the review can suffer. Yet rushing through a review of increasingly complex requirements practically guarantees compliance issues will slip through.
Strategies for Managing Specification Complexity
Invest in Front-End Planning
The most effective strategy for managing complex specifications is thorough front-end planning. During preconstruction, project teams should conduct detailed specification reviews to identify particularly complex requirements, long-lead items, and potential compliance challenges.
Creating a comprehensive submittal schedule early – before work begins – allows teams to sequence reviews appropriately and allocate adequate time for complex items. This schedule should account for realistic review times, potential resubmissions, and design team availability.
Leverage Technology Solutions
The construction industry has been historically slow to adopt technology, but specification complexity is driving change. BuildSync and similar AI-powered tools can help project teams manage the increased burden by automating portions of the review process, extracting technical data points, and flagging potential non-compliance issues before submittals reach design teams.
Digital submittal management platforms can also help teams track status, maintain documentation, and ensure nothing falls through the cracks. The key is finding solutions that integrate with existing workflows rather than requiring wholesale process changes.
Improve Specification Literacy
Project teams should invest in training to improve specification literacy across all levels. Understanding how specifications are structured, where critical requirements typically appear, and how to efficiently extract relevant information can significantly reduce review time.
For project engineers, developing expertise in reading and interpreting complex specifications – particularly in specialized areas like smart building integration or sustainability requirements – pays dividends throughout their careers. Regular training sessions and mentorship from senior team members can accelerate this development.
Strengthen Vendor Relationships
Close collaboration with suppliers and manufacturers can help navigate complex specification requirements. Vendors who understand project-specific requirements can prepare more complete submittals on the first pass, reducing review cycles.
Establishing clear communication channels and expectations with the supply chain – particularly for complex or critical equipment – helps ensure submittal packages include all required documentation, certifications, and technical data.
Implement Systematic Quality Control
Developing systematic quality control processes for submittal preparation and review can catch errors before they become problems. This might include checklists for common requirements, peer reviews for complex submittals, and software tools that verify data completeness.
For general contractors, establishing clear standards for what constitutes a complete submittal – and returning incomplete packages immediately rather than attempting partial reviews – can actually speed up the overall process by forcing better preparation upstream.
Looking Forward
Construction specifications will likely continue growing in complexity as building codes evolve, sustainability requirements expand, and smart building technologies become standard. The industry must adapt processes, tools, and skillsets to manage this increased complexity without proportionally increasing costs and timelines.
The organizations that thrive will be those that invest in the right combination of process improvements, technology adoption, and workforce development. While specification complexity presents challenges, it also drives better building performance, improved sustainability, and more sophisticated projects. The key is developing systems and capabilities that can efficiently manage complexity without sacrificing quality or profitability.
Success in this evolving landscape requires recognizing that submittal review is not just an administrative task – it’s a critical quality control checkpoint that directly impacts project outcomes. Teams that treat it as such, investing appropriate resources and attention, will be better positioned to deliver successful projects despite increasingly complex requirements.
View the original article and our Inspiration here
Leave a Reply