Tariffs will change the way projects are financed, delivered

Tariffs will change the way projects are financed, delivered

This audio is auto-generated. Please let us know if you have feedback.

Brian Gallagher is vice president of corporate development at Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois-based contractor Graycor. Opinions are the author’s own.

The cost of building has never been more volatile. Tariffs on key construction materials like steel, aluminum and lumber are driving up project budgets across the country, compounding inflationary pressures already present in a post-pandemic economy. 

While headlines often focus on housing and infrastructure, the commercial real estate sector — particularly industrial and manufacturing construction — is feeling these cost increases acutely. These dynamics are not just squeezing budgets; they’re fundamentally altering how deals are structured, how risk is evaluated and how projects are executed.

As total development costs rise, the risk profiles of many projects are changing — prompting a reaction from lenders. Higher construction budgets often mean borrowers need more capital, either in the form of increased debt or additional equity. For lenders, this shifts key metrics like loan-to-cost and debt-service coverage ratios, especially in tighter-margin projects.

Brian Gallagher is an executive at general contractor Graycor.

Brian Gallagher

Courtesy of Graycor

 

In response, financial institutions are adjusting their underwriting models. Many are requiring more detailed cost escalation strategies, larger contingency budgets and earlier confirmation of contractor pricing. 

In some cases, lenders and investors are having greater influence over the design and construction firm selection process. Some projects are seeing delayed closings or restructuring of deal terms, as initial pro formas no longer “pencil out” under the pressure of higher inputs.

Escalating costs are reshaping the capital stack altogether. Lenders are becoming more conservative, while equity investors are being asked to absorb greater upfront risk, particularly for new developments in uncertain markets.

Timing and cash flow

Another major impact of material cost volatility is the way it affects construction cash flow. With long-lead materials like structural steel, mechanical equipment and electrical gear experiencing both cost and supply chain pressures, developers are front-loading their procurement timelines. 

Materials that may have once been ordered mid-project are now being purchased as early as possible to lock in pricing and ensure availability.

This shift compresses draw schedules and requires more liquidity upfront, altering the traditional capital flow of a project. For industrial and manufacturing projects — where materials are heavy, specialized and sourced globally — this effect is magnified. 

Carrying costs increase, and working capital must stretch further and earlier. If developers aren’t strategic in managing cash flow, one project’s acceleration can jeopardize the broader portfolio’s liquidity.

Strategic adjustments

The development community is rapidly adapting with more sophisticated risk management strategies. One increasingly common approach is early contractor involvement — bringing construction teams into the design phase to help identify risks, recommend materials and lock in pricing sooner. Preconstruction is no longer viewed as a planning step, but as a vital tool for financial control and project viability.

Developers are also leaning heavily on collaborative delivery models like design-build and construction manager at risk, which encourage alignment between design, cost and schedule from the outset. Guaranteed maximum price contracts with built-in escalation clauses to hedge against future material spikes are becoming more common as a means of sharing and limiting exposure.

Procurement strategies are also evolving. Some owners are warehousing materials, purchasing early and storing on or offsite to ensure both cost and schedule certainty. This tactic, while requiring upfront capital and storage planning, is proving effective in volatile commodity environments.

View the original article and our Inspiration here


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *